I believe now-former Stellantis CEO Carlos Tavares was an attention-grabbing determine for simply how unpopular he was. Certain, only a few prime executives get to the place they’re by making pals in every single place they go. However Tavrares was considerably distinctive in how a lot he managed to make everybody mad at him; the workers, the unions, the board members, the suppliers and the shoppers are all most likely thrilled to see him go. That is virtually a expertise in and of itself.
However Tavares was additionally the chief architect behind Stellantis, the weird conglomerate fashioned in a merger of Fiat Chrysler with France’s Groupe PSA. What that firm and its 14 automotive manufacturers even are with out him is an open query, and it comes proper forward of a vital yr on many fronts—together with the electrical one.
That kicks off the primary Vital Supplies information roundup of December 2024. We at InsideEVs hope you had a beautiful Thanksgiving, if you happen to noticed it. Additionally on immediately’s docket: a Mercedes-Benz EV fireplace forces some huge modifications in South Korea, and might President-elect Donald Trump “open up” China’s EV sector?
30%: Tavares Out At Stellantis. Now What?
Picture by: Stellantis
Carlos Tavares, Stellantis CEO
It is onerous to consider this, however we’re not even 4 full years into the existence of the entity that’s Stellantis, the cross-Atlantic holding firm that owns Jeep, Dodge, Ram, Alfa Romeo, Peugeot, Opel, Fiat and a bunch of different manufacturers. That is lots of mouths to feed; I am not even positive it may be completed. However now Tavares, the previous CEO of the PSA Group, is totally out even earlier than his deliberate early 2026 retirement.
Stellantis was fashioned on the concept the automotive business was dealing with a profound transformation the one technique to survive it’s via scale: combining the sources of those many manufacturers to maintain prices down and drive investments sooner or later. And perhaps issues would have gone in a different way if COVID-19 hadn’t blown up the automotive provide chain and raised automotive costs, although Tavares’ management is totally responsible of taking that and working with it.
In the long run, Tavares’ tenure was doomed on two fronts. He was coping with the European auto disaster on his dwelling turf—falling gross sales, elevated competitors from Chinese language automotive manufacturers and waning EV curiosity as subsidies vanished—and plummeting income within the profitable North American market as individuals stopped shopping for these newly ultra-expensive Jeeps and Ram vans. This facet of the Atlantic paid greater than half Stellantis’ payments however Tavares’ crew was roundly accused of jacking up costs and ravenous Jeep and others of recent merchandise to gasoline a renaissance for sure European manufacturers like Alfa Romeo, which did not work out, both. Now it is dealing with existential issues like plant closures, livid sellers and an unclear technique for what’s subsequent. Earnings have been down practically 50% this yr as 2024 was set to be a sort of complete write-off.
The factor is—and do not take this as a protection of Tavares, as a result of I’ve no real interest in setting up one—some optimistic modifications have been starting to take form. Jeep has a brand new CEO who’s working to make its costs much less unhinged and get new fashions on the highway, and Stellantis is beginning to present some actual promise on the EV entrance after years of lagging behind. However in the long run, it wasn’t sufficient to avoid wasting Tavares and he most likely did not deserve it anyway.
So now what? For one, there’s the matter of succession. However as The Detroit Information identified, Stellantis has a reasonably skinny bench lately; it witnessed an enormous govt expertise drain beneath Tavares and will probably be run by a committee within the interim, not an appearing CEO. And Stellantis has an enormous yr forward: it is presupposed to launch the Dodge Charger EV, the electrical Jeep Wagoneer S, the Ram 1500 Rev and Ramcharger EREV and extra subsequent yr. That is simply on the North American entrance; extra are coming in Europe too. There are new EVs coming from Fiat, Peugeot, that take care of China’s Leapmotor… loads is happening proper now.
From the Information:
In North America, the place income fell 42% within the third quarter and shipments have been off 36%, it seems Stellantis has a “first rate plan” for a turnaround, mentioned Stephanie Brinley, principal automotive analyst at S&P International Inc.
“It is a matter of letting it play out,” she mentioned. “They have been making progress on adjusting pricing. They’re making progress on not simply making issues cheaper, however attempting to give you a technique to repackage and develop merchandise which can be giving shoppers the best worth.”
Subsequent yr, Stellantis wants to maneuver ahead with the a number of merchandise it is launching — together with high-profile EV choices — and guarantee these launches go as easily as attainable, she mentioned: “It will be a giant yr for them, and they should have it go as easily as attainable, and which means having the ability to deal with no matter sudden points come up in addition to attainable.”
Good luck to whoever leads to that job. They are going to want it.
60%: Korea’s Mercedes Fireplace Sparks New EV Rules
This is the factor about lithium-ion battery fires: they’re statistically way more uncommon than inner combustion autos, however far nastier to place out after they do occur. That is particularly dangerous information in South Korea, a rustic with huge EV ambitions however the place most city individuals dwell in high-rise towers. One Mercedes-Benz EV fireplace earlier this yr (adopted by one other involving a Kia) has the nation spooked about what might occur if these automobiles are parked underground. That Mercedes fireplace alone despatched dozens of tower residents to the hospital and left 200 households briefly homeless.
So now, based on Bloomberg, South Korea is making modifications that the remainder of the world ought to contemplate adopting:
The brand new set of laws included mandating automakers disclose the manufacturers of their batteries, increasing the scope of security inspections for present EVs and stopping autos from being absolutely charged.
The federal government has additionally immediately stepped in to make sure the security of batteries through a state-run certification system. The pilot venture has been working since mid-October with 5 corporations, together with carmakers Hyundai Motor Co. and Kia Corp. in addition to cell producer LG Vitality Resolution Ltd., taking part.
[…] Earlier than the initiative, EVs have been offered in South Korea with none third-party security assessments. Underneath the brand new system, state-run companies just like the Korea Car Testing & Analysis Institute will put batteries via their paces earlier than set up, making certain they meet government-backed security certification requirements.
Korea planted its flag early within the EV house and lately, it looks as if each fourth or fifth automotive in Seoul is an electrical Hyundai or Kia. The nation would not wish to again down in spite of everything these investments, so these ought to be seen as optimistic strikes:
The Mercedes-Benz blaze was undoubtedly an unlucky occasion, nevertheless it forged a much-needed highlight on the problem and sparked requires stricter laws. In the end, it might function a wake-up name for South Korea to create a safer, extra supportive atmosphere for battery-powered automobiles.
This is hoping.
90%: Can Trump Strike A ‘Deal’ With China’s EV Makers?
In the meantime, again within the U.S., the auto business and consumers like are on pins and needles as they wait to see if incoming President Donald Trump will actually act to kill the EV tax credit score or if he is inclined to seek out a way ahead that will not threaten manufacturing jobs in purple and purple states. However there’s additionally the query of China’s automakers—at the moment stored out of the U.S. by tariffs and software program restrictions—and what function they might play domestically. Trump has mentioned prior to now that he’d moderately they construct automobiles within the U.S. than abroad: “In the event that they wish to construct a plant in Michigan, in Ohio, in South Carolina, they’ll, utilizing American employees,” he mentioned in March.
That is undoubtedly a scary proposition if you happen to’re Ford, or Normal Motors, or Volkswagen, or heck, even Tesla. However Steve LeVine at The Info (subscription required) proposes that Chinese language EVs might come stateside as a part of a broader commerce take care of the nation:
But there may be cause to anticipate that Trump—after beginning with maximal threats, like a 60% tariff he has vowed to impose on all Chinese language items—will favor a grand commerce cut price during which the institution of Chinese language EV and battery factories within the U.S. could be a central characteristic. In alternate for that and different sweeteners to decrease the U.S.-China commerce imbalance, Beijing would search lowered tariffs.
The explanation: Trump, whereas unpredictable and vulnerable to reversing course, would rightly view the potential for billions of {dollars} in funding, 1000’s of jobs and an unbelievable diplomatic breakthrough as a dealmaking coup that may burnish his legacy. For his half, President Xi Jinping “needs Chinese language corporations to dominate world markets in EVs and batteries,” mentioned Ian Bremmer, president of geopolitical danger consultancy Eurasia Group. “Name it the Japanese mannequin of the ’80s and ’90s. International domination requires a world presence.”
So might this really work out for the U.S.? By way of upping its battery recreation, which badly must occur, the reply might be sure:
[…] the U.S. might unroll a welcome mat to Chinese language factories a win so long as an organization like BYD, China’s largest EV producer, sourced most of its components and supplies from North America and shared its technical data together with his American workers. “I believe it’s within the pursuits of the U.S. to onshore the dominant Chinese language EV maker,” he mentioned. “An funding like this helps the build-out of an onshore EV ecosystem from crucial minerals manufacturing and recycling to battery manufacturing and charging community improvement.”
However then once more:
Now Trump has invited Chinese language EV makers into the U.S., and a part of that cut price would doubtless be that they share what they know with American rivals. “In a whole function reversal from the ’00s, when international [automakers] wishing to entry the rising Chinese language market have been involved about compelled tech switch, it’s now Beijing susceptible to inadvertently undermining its corporations in worldwide markets by serving to rivals catch up,” mentioned Bremmer, the Eurasia Group president.
The deal is more likely to be solely the start: CATL, Byd and different Chinese language corporations make a lot of the world’s LFP batteries, and U.S. LFP startups haven’t even begun to fabricate them. Relying on the association Trump affords, CATL appears more likely to search different enterprise within the U.S.—and to get a heat welcome from automakers in search of the most cost effective and at the moment one of the best batteries. “The US doesn’t have [LFP] specialists,” a CATL engineer mentioned. “The Chinese language business may also help construct that native expertise pool.”
That story’s value a learn in full. However Tesla CEO Elon Musk and Large Oil even have Trump’s ear greater than most, so it is also onerous to fathom he’ll develop into deeply eager about aggressive battery expertise unexpectedly.
100%: Who Would You Choose To Lead Stellantis?
Ralph Gilles Stellantis Jeep Wagoneer S
I’ve at all times been a fan of Ralph Gilles, the Chrysler-Fiat Chrysler-SRT-Stellantis design guru who’s as accountable as anybody for America’s Twenty first-century muscle automotive renaissance (and will get the place the EV market goes.) He is a wise man. However he could also be too good to wish to tackle that many manufacturers.
Who ought to get the highest spot at Stellantis subsequent, and what should they do to proper the ship?
Contact the writer: [email protected]
