Ferrari disappoints itself as soon as once more. In fashionable Method 1, tire administration is a vital issue for efficiency. Failing to optimize tire utilization considerably limits a staff’s competitiveness, and in the course of the first qualifying session of the Qatar weekend, Ferrari uncovered its vulnerabilities on this space. The problem, exacerbated by unexpectedly cool temperatures in comparison with these in Saudi Arabia, left the Maranello staff unable to adapt successfully. The Q3 session served as a transparent instance, with the Ferrari drivers showing unsure about tips on how to proceed, compounded by inadequate assist from the pit wall.
Within the sole follow session out there, Ferrari centered closely on balancing the automotive. They performed in depth laps utilizing the Arduous compound to attain constant efficiency. For Qatar, the staff opted for a medium-high downforce rear wing, a choice aligned with most different groups. Whereas not reaching the utmost potential stage, the setup was barely under optimum. Vital efforts had been additionally made to validate the up to date flooring, that includes modifications across the edge. This improve was briefly examined by Carlos Sainz in Las Vegas in the course of the first follow session, whereas in Losail, it was Charles Leclerc’s flip to trial it.
Inspired by constructive suggestions from automotive quantity 16, Ferrari determined to retain the up to date flooring for qualifying and the Dash Race, with the choice to revert to the older specification if wanted. Through the restricted 60-minute session to fine-tune the automobiles, Charles Leclerc was instructed to carry out a number of managed laps on the Medium tires to check the ground. These runs, performed with out using aero rakes or flow-viz, relied solely on load cells. In the meantime, the Smooth compound remained largely untested, leaving questions on its efficiency for the Dash Qualifying session.
Throughout qualifying, each drivers complained about vital rotation points, which proved to be the first impediment to unlocking efficiency. The automobiles suffered from understeer that transitioned into oversteer throughout nook exits. Whereas the automobiles did generate substantial downforce, a constructive takeaway for the Maranello staff, the shortcoming to keep up the goal tire temperatures robbed them of vital grip. This was an surprising setback for Ferrari, which had designed a warm-up technique that originally appeared efficient.
Including to the poor outcome was a setup that did not carry out optimally below the cooler circumstances. Ferrari was caught off guard, neglecting to make setup changes to counteract the shortage of rotation. As a substitute, they relied on knowledge gathered throughout FP1, satisfied that the correct tire administration technique would yield the specified efficiency. Sadly, this method proved ineffective, and as soon as once more, the 2 SF-24 automobiles displayed vital untapped potential. Efficiency that would have made a distinction was left unrealized because of poor execution.
McLaren demonstrated precisely what Ferrari was lacking: wonderful steadiness, achieved by optimum tire administration. The MCL38 featured a pointy and exact front-end that labored harmoniously with the rear, sustaining secure alignment between the 2 axes. The McLaren automobiles dominated the primary two sectors of the monitor, whereas Verstappen claimed the quickest time within the third. McLaren’s tires activated extra shortly—a attribute trait of the papaya automotive—whereas Ferrari opted for a delayed activation technique, aiming to profit from better grip throughout the remainder of the lap.
With the Smooth compounds, nonetheless, Ferrari tried to regulate preliminary tire temperatures to enhance efficiency within the first sector. This method backfired, resulting in front-end overheating and exacerbating the rotation points beforehand famous. McLaren additionally confronted challenges stabilizing tire temperatures however in the end succeeded, whereas for Ferrari, this job changed into a nightmare, derailing their whole technique in the course of the vital moments of the session. With restricted time and already-used tires, there was no alternative for Ferrari to get well.
Mercedes as soon as once more delivered a formidable efficiency, notably by George Russell, aided by the cooler monitor temperature of simply 21.5°C. These circumstances helped the W15 mitigate overheating points successfully. Quicker tire activation in the course of the out-lap supplied better grip over a single lap, permitting Russell’s automotive to outperform the SF-24 when it comes to outright efficiency. Moreover, Russell’s exact dealing with performed a vital position in extracting the automotive’s potential.
Lastly, Crimson Bull. Max Verstappen admitted he wasn’t quick sufficient in the course of the session. The RB20’s main concern was its steadiness. Through the sole follow session, the staff struggled to search out an optimum working window for the automotive. Verstappen didn’t pinpoint a single downside however famous understeer in some corners and over-rotation in others, with the entrance and rear axes disconnected—a recurring concern in latest weeks. General, the compromise Crimson Bull settled on proved much less efficient than the setups chosen by Ferrari and McLaren.
— see video above —
Purchase official Ferrari F1 merchandise!
Let different Scuderia Followers find out about us
