A sophisticated qualifying session for Ferrari in England, however it’s nothing surprising. The Silverstone circuit isn’t suited to the SF-24 seen on Saturday. The Maranello staff arrived right here within the worst potential circumstances, so it was by no means going to be straightforward to attain a fantastic consequence. Charles Leclerc was eradicated within the transition from Q2 to Q3, whereas Carlos Sainz completed seventh and can begin from the fourth row forward of right this moment’s British Grand Prix.
On Friday, the Ferrari drivers used two completely different aerodynamic configurations: not simply two completely different wings, however they in contrast the brand new and the outdated aerodynamic package deal, which incorporates sidepods and the ground. In response to staff principal Frederic Vasseur, the brand new aerodynamic package deal generated too many problems for use, in order that they took a step again and returned to utilizing the outdated configuration. Nevertheless, Carlos Sainz continued to complain, not having a great feeling in any respect.
The 2 drivers had small variations in wing angles and experience heights. The engineers wished to discover a center floor that might carry advantages each on the straights and within the corners. General, a number of components impacted Ferrari’s efficiency within the qualifying session, leading to such a destructive end result. The climate circumstances didn’t favor the optimum use of the SF-24’s tires: usually they don’t put extra vitality into the tire carcass, so in cooler circumstances, they battle to keep up the perfect temperature, each floor and inside. That is just like Purple Bull, which we are going to talk about later.
F1, Ferrari: in a single day work to restrict oversteer
On Friday, Ferrari had extreme rotation in high-speed corners. A decidedly unstable and detrimental situation for lap time. In a single day, they did every part potential to mitigate this persistent oversteer, in search of a brand new setup within the Maranello simulator. The aerodynamic stability was shifted barely in direction of the rear to restrict rear-end sliding.
Nevertheless, this work nonetheless unbalanced the automotive, resulting in extra understeer at excessive speeds, however this kind of habits makes the automotive extra steady in comparison with oversteer. Because of this, time was misplaced within the Becketts sequence, the place there are numerous quick corners in succession. A worse racing line in a single nook ends in a suboptimal line within the subsequent flip. This partly explains the four-tenths misplaced in flip 2. Within the first and third sectors, the injury was contained, additionally contemplating that in sluggish corners Ferrari discovered a passable stability, which, as talked about, was missing at excessive speeds.
McLaren, however, didn’t optimize their efficiency on monitor. Partly as a result of automotive, but in addition as a result of drivers: each tousled their remaining try, throwing away a front-row begin. The automotive was extra oversteering at low speeds, probably as a result of the rear was stiffened to optimize the quick sections. In all of the extensive radius corners, they had been very quick, a attribute of the MCL38 single-seater.
Mercedes, partly, had an identical stability. At low speeds, there was extra rotation, however they nonetheless managed to do nicely in traction. When it comes to suspension, they discovered a superb compromise to make sure mechanical grip and make the ground work nicely in high-speed corners. The issue that after once more appears to have made the distinction for the Silver Arrows is the temperatures. The W15 takes a big step ahead when temperatures drop by a couple of levels. On Saturday, bear in mind, the monitor floor was lower than 22°C.
Even at Purple Bull, the consequence was not optimized. On this case, nevertheless, the efficiency was restricted by injury to Max Verstappen’s ground, which the staff believes value about three-tenths. Regardless, a number of factors of downforce had been misplaced, with which the Dutchman discovered himself a bit misplaced. The staff seen a reversal in stability. There was far more understeer, which appears to have been restricted by growing the entrance wing angle. This, in fact, negatively affected the minimal speeds at excessive speeds.
On the micro-sector degree, we instantly discover how Mercedes did higher than McLaren on the straights. For this reason we are able to say that on Saturday the Brackley staff managed to seek out a superb aerodynamic compromise, producing good downforce with out paying an excessive amount of when it comes to drag. Excessive effectivity in the end widens the setup window.
Within the first sector, Ferrari was very strong with Carlos Sainz. On the braking of flip 3, he did a superb job on entry however then misplaced out on exit. As much as that time, the SF-24 was on the extent of the McLaren, simply behind George Russell’s Mercedes. A lot of the hole amassed at flip 6 on entry, the place the Spaniard had a number of understeer. Right here, the Ferrari SF-24 of Carlos Sainz misplaced so much with out recovering a lot in the remainder of the lap. We’re speaking a few good two and a half tenths.
At medium speeds, Purple Bull appeared very aggressive. In flip 8, Max Verstappen managed to maintain a really tight line, whereas the others needed to take a extra “V”-shaped racing line. Right here, Max Verstappen gained so much, just about going underneath George Russell’s time. In traction, Mercedes proved to be wonderful, optimizing velocity alongside the stretch main to show 9 (Copse) after which to Becketts.
Within the well-known sequence of corners, the SF-24 loses a few tenth. Vital losses, nevertheless, are concentrated at flip 14, as a result of the drivers arrive extensive on entry as a consequence of understeer. There alone, one other tenth is misplaced. Lastly, at flip 15, Carlos Sainz leaves a minimum of one other tenth on the desk. Within the final two corners, the hole then stays fixed.
Supply: FUnoanalisitecnica